LendingTree today released its study on where homeowners stay in their houses the longest.
“A lack of supply has been a persistent buyers’ challenge in the housing market since the financial crisis,” said Tendayi Kapfidze, Chief Economist at LendingTree. “There are not enough houses on the market, which has contributed to significant price surges in many cities.”
Many homeowners have opted to stay in place, but how long they choose to do so varies by location. LendingTree analysts set out to assess the variation in the 50 largest cities in America. On average, homeowners have been in their houses for about seven years, with a high of 7.54 years in Pittsburgh to a low of 6.36 in Las Vegas. The difference may not seem like much, but research reveals a significant difference in home price appreciation that is related to the average tenure.
In this study they had the following findings:
- Cities with shorter housing tenure have greater price appreciation. The top 10 cities had an average tenure of 7.46 years and an average three-year home price appreciation of 12 percent. The bottom 10, with an average tenure of 6.63 years, have average price appreciation 30 percent. This suggests that higher housing turnover drives prices upward, while faster price appreciation could be enticing home owners to sell.
- The northeast dominates the list of cities with the longest tenure. The top three cities, Pittsburgh, New York and Buffalo are all in the northeast. An additional three northeastern cities are in the top 10 for a total of six.
- Hot and sunny places have the shortest tenures. The three cities with the shortest tenures — Las Vegas, Phoenix and Austin — are all in warm-weather areas. This reflects high migration rates to those cities. Denver is the only city in the bottom 10 that experiences a significant winter season.
To view the full report, visit here.
50 Largest Cities Ranked by Housing Tenure |
||||||
Rank |
City |
Average |
Average |
Median |
Median |
Median |
1 |
Pittsburgh |
7.54 |
55.58 |
$153,300 |
3% |
14% |
2 |
New York |
7.53 |
55.95 |
$440,900 |
3% |
11% |
3 |
Buffalo, N.Y. |
7.5 |
55.54 |
$148,900 |
5% |
19% |
4 |
Philadelphia |
7.49 |
54.49 |
$250,900 |
2% |
7% |
5 |
New |
7.48 |
55 |
$193,100 |
3% |
11% |
6 |
Hartford, |
7.45 |
54.96 |
$247,900 |
0% |
2% |
7 |
Cleveland |
7.44 |
55.88 |
$150,400 |
3% |
9% |
8 |
Los Angeles |
7.42 |
55.92 |
$617,100 |
7% |
25% |
9 |
Providence, |
7.4 |
55.16 |
$277,400 |
5% |
11% |
10 |
Memphis, |
7.37 |
54.54 |
$148,800 |
4% |
12% |
11 |
Baltimore |
7.32 |
53.91 |
$297,300 |
1% |
6% |
12 |
Milwaukee |
7.31 |
53.84 |
$213,800 |
5% |
12% |
13 |
St. Louis |
7.3 |
53.94 |
$172,200 |
2% |
10% |
14 |
San Jose, |
7.3 |
54.51 |
$957,700 |
5% |
30% |
15 |
Chicago |
7.29 |
53.78 |
$240,300 |
5% |
13% |
16 |
Boston |
7.24 |
54.49 |
$441,400 |
7% |
18% |
17 |
San |
7.23 |
55.75 |
$849,500 |
7% |
29% |
18 |
Birmingham, |
7.22 |
54.14 |
$161,400 |
5% |
11% |
19 |
Richmond, |
7.17 |
54.36 |
$237,900 |
5% |
11% |
20 |
Virginia |
7.17 |
54.08 |
$245,900 |
3% |
6% |
21 |
Louisville, |
7.16 |
54.01 |
$168,600 |
4% |
11% |
22 |
Detroit |
7.15 |
54.44 |
$171,600 |
7% |
26% |
23 |
Cincinnati |
7.15 |
53.3 |
$165,500 |
0% |
9% |
24 |
Washington |
7.09 |
52.74 |
$424,600 |
3% |
10% |
25 |
Columbus, |
7.09 |
52.39 |
$182,300 |
6% |
13% |
26 |
Kansas City, |
7.05 |
52.61 |
$180,700 |
4% |
13% |
27 |
Minneapolis |
7.03 |
51.42 |
$254,800 |
6% |
18% |
28 |
Miami |
7.02 |
57.57 |
$278,700 |
7% |
33% |
29 |
San Diego |
7 |
55.49 |
$563,800 |
7% |
23% |
30 |
San Antonio |
6.99 |
53.59 |
$170,100 |
6% |
18% |
31 |
Charlotte, |
6.99 |
52.56 |
$197,100 |
5% |
16% |
32 |
Atlanta |
6.99 |
52.16 |
$215,100 |
9% |
26% |
33 |
Indianapolis |
6.95 |
52.29 |
$162,200 |
6% |
15% |
34 |
Sacramento, |
6.95 |
54.86 |
$390,000 |
7% |
24% |
35 |
Seattle |
6.89 |
52.54 |
$439,800 |
12% |
31% |
36 |
Dallas |
6.89 |
51.72 |
$214,900 |
14% |
34% |
37 |
Riverside, |
6.86 |
54.04 |
$342,300 |
7% |
26% |
38 |
Raleigh, N.C. |
6.85 |
50.9 |
$244,500 |
3% |
15% |
39 |
Portland, |
6.84 |
53.34 |
$376,000 |
9% |
36% |
40 |
Salt Lake |
6.82 |
50.17 |
$294,800 |
10% |
24% |
41 |
Houston |
6.82 |
51.47 |
$192,900 |
6% |
26% |
42 |
Oklahoma |
6.78 |
52.37 |
$156,800 |
2% |
13% |
43 |
Nashville, |
6.76 |
51.98 |
$242,900 |
16% |
37% |
44 |
Tampa, Fla. |
6.73 |
57.63 |
$191,200 |
9% |
28% |
45 |
Jacksonville, |
6.72 |
54.6 |
$205,100 |
9% |
29% |
46 |
Denver |
6.63 |
51.61 |
$386,800 |
11% |
40% |
47 |
Orlando, Fla. |
6.59 |
54.72 |
$219,000 |
9% |
35% |
48 |
Austin, |
6.49 |
50.76 |
$283,600 |
8% |
30% |
49 |
Phoenix |
6.43 |
54.4 |
$246,900 |
7% |
25% |
50 |
Las Vegas |
6.36 |
53.71 |
$250,000 |
7% |
32% |
Methodology
To determine the cities with the longest housing tenure, LendingTree looked at data pulled in December 2018 from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. The data includes median home values that we also included in the study. The definition of cities is from the Census Bureau’s Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA) boundaries.